Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 12:20:20 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 147881] [zfs] [patch] ZFS "sharenfs" doesn't allow different "exports" options for different hosts Message-ID: <bug-147881-3630-gftpjnKgO8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-147881-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-147881-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D147881 --- Comment #22 from Richard S. Conto <Richard.Conto@gmail.com> --- I've seen configuration schemes like that, and they tend to be fragile. The questions that come to my mind off-hand are: (1) Are multiple attributes concatenated as a single string or as separate statements? (2) How is ordering done? Lexically, such that "freebsd_share_10" comes be= fore "freebsd_share_2" or is some syntax imposed on the attribute name itself (a= nd what happens to attributes that partially match the syntax?)=20=20 (3) What happens if "intermediate" attributes are removed or edited? Also, different protocols seem to require different sharing syntax, especia= lly when identity management is involved. ---- And any solution will be FreeBSD specific - and not necessarily portable to other systems. At that point, just implement it outside of ZFS anyway. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-147881-3630-gftpjnKgO8>