Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 22:03:24 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, core@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, kaleb@x.org, phk@critter.tfs.com, wollman@lcs.mit.edu Subject: Re: Locale stuff: call for conclusion. Message-ID: <Cny3gXmK34@ache.dialup.demos.ru> In-Reply-To: <199510191833.LAA03023@phaeton.artisoft.com>; from Terry Lambert at Thu, 19 Oct 1995 11:33:54 -0700 (MST) References: <199510191833.LAA03023@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199510191833.LAA03023@phaeton.artisoft.com> Terry Lambert
writes:
>> Well, so lets put XPG3 library into libc and made additional XPG4
>> library linked by -lxpg4. I assume that two libraries will
>> be made from same sources, of course. Do you agree with that?
>Yes, of course.
>The problem is in shared library symbol overrride for other libraries.
>You have to make sure that even though there are identically named
>symbols, ALL the symbols come from only one or the other.
Well, it is linker issue and can be solved (if not already solved)
after separation will be done. What happens if I link -lxpg4
statically and left libc as dynamic?
--
Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed,
ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead -
http://dt.demos.su/~ache : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead.
RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Cny3gXmK34>