From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 23 17:18:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE0B16A4CE for ; Sun, 23 May 2004 17:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta05-svc.ntlworld.com (mta05-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D9643D46 for ; Sun, 23 May 2004 17:18:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tom.hurst@clara.net) Received: from voi.aagh.net ([81.104.55.176]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP id <20040524001642.NRFH2927.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@voi.aagh.net> for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 01:16:42 +0100 Received: from freaky by voi.aagh.net with local (Exim 4.34; FreeBSD) id 1BS3AZ-0000lr-A7 for freebsd-threads@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 May 2004 01:18:19 +0100 Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 01:18:19 +0100 From: Thomas Hurst To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040524001819.GA2713@voi.aagh.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org References: <5.2.0.9.2.20040522052606.0156fd70@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040521154458.01627688@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.2.20040521154458.01627688@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.2.20040522052606.0156fd70@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040523103738.01563ed0@mail.ojoink.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20040523103738.01563ed0@mail.ojoink.com> Organization: Not much. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: Thomas Hurst Subject: Re: Why is MySQL nearly twice as fast on Linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 00:18:37 -0000 * JG (amd64list@jpgsworld.com) wrote: > I use 30 10000 for everything because I feel it simulates a more > realistic load on the server (But I could be wrong). It takes a good > 2-4 minutes between tests though.. :( Well, super-smack isn't that effecient; with 30 clients you'll be getting 30 copies of it (perl I think) sucking down millions of records each; that saps a lot of power away from MySQL, so poor performance is to be expected. -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - freaky@aagh.net - http://www.aagh.net/