From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 26 06:35:17 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816081065674;
	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:35:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.214.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756328FC08;
	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:35:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so4792664bkv.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=oas635gVhoVXywuZLkMWFDkCnlQ2BBE3NK5YRVsj5ZA=;
	b=T9V+a+arihBNJjbeasRIF14vFul68nomSqMR/8HNGsDAWZRNdhk4HDSImi0tE0Gu5a
	CX+sk1byx6vGN+Z+7zpNYyBxjmE2DpUWzZ4V/rJQNf3wrV/Ew1es4l8jRbbT6Te36esV
	6No92uU2FdvKSr0EB8UdywcIG1jFJ19vxohIMHSRR54bjAV0WKu9IumUtQv2GJxuG+py
	iq4A3bUkdCuqDnhZvdvIuGrTmWbxCC2RpoAxW8oUur7IBhj+luyJthKN4ulfXaFpy4V3
	wWbRIa04kf+yP7q2MsrNltSrrdPWfYtawnKNzigEkbfX09gvVBYWYrTweNGuOMGLSFop
	rZ2w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.156.155 with SMTP id x27mr4915393bkw.84.1340692515295;
	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.49.87 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.49.87 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206260805450.3572@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <CACqU3MXaa0R7fG6Q-EqS3h8PJh__tzNeugBxVyqKHxsCR-wTuQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206260805450.3572@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:35:15 +0100
Message-ID: <CADLo83_hLe-MUJASLmx+8MBj12LOQ_-gsmWNjpzvzZdxwEgStw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
	Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>, kby@freebsd.org, bp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: sysctl filesystem ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:35:17 -0000

On Jun 26, 2012 7:07 AM, "Wojciech Puchar" <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
wrote:
>
> as well as we don't depend of /proc for normal operation we shouldn't for
say /proc/sysctl
>
> improvements are welcome, better documentation is welcome, changes to
what is OK - isn't.

/proc/sysctl might be useful.  Just because Linux uses it doesn't make it a
bad idea.

Chris