From owner-freebsd-doc@freebsd.org  Fri Dec  9 12:49:03 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DABC6AB8F
 for <freebsd-doc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri,  9 Dec 2016 12:49:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7550128F
 for <freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org>; Fri,  9 Dec 2016 12:49:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id uB9Cn3kE087227
 for <freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 12:49:03 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 206709] Ports links to long descriptions have revision
 parameter duplicated, confusing svnweb
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 12:49:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Documentation
X-Bugzilla-Component: Website
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: andipersti@gmail.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-206709-9-zshYwg03RZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-206709-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-206709-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-doc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 12:49:04 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206709

--- Comment #6 from Andreas Perstinger <andipersti@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Dave Evans from comment #5)
No the bug is still not fixed.

How did you test the py27-reverend port?

If you use the port search form, then the generated result page doesn't use=
 the
portindex script and thus the bug doesn't show up.

The portindex script only creates the category listing pages. E.g. if you g=
o to
Categories Listed By Groups
(https://www.freebsd.org/ports/categories-grouped.html) and there follow the
link for the Textproc category, the link to the long description for
py27-reverend still doesn't work.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=