From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 28 22:52:07 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA09283 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 28 Apr 1995 22:52:07 -0700 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA09277 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 1995 22:52:04 -0700 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id WAA24121; Fri, 28 Apr 1995 22:51:54 -0700 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199504290551.WAA24121@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: What I'd *really like* for 2.0.5 To: nate@trout.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 1995 22:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Cc: nate@trout.sri.MT.net, jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199504290547.XAA06260@trout.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Apr 28, 95 11:47:16 pm Content-Type: text Content-Length: 633 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > What I meant was that userconfig assumes the user has knowlege on how it > works, so for normal people they don't have 'access' to it. Access was > probably a poor choice of word to use. *IF* we are going to use it for > all of the kernel device debugging, then it should be better documented > before we remove the only useful form we have now. printf("Use \"boot /kernel -c\" to see what you don't see."); ? :-) Lousy argument in my book... -- Poul-Henning Kamp -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'