From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Nov 11 20:57:58 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id UAA24138
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 11 Nov 1995 20:57:58 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA24133
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 11 Nov 1995 20:57:55 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA14274; Sat, 11 Nov 1995 20:57:42 -0800
To: "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@geli.com>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: That G&*()m process limit 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 11 Nov 1995 20:40:50 PST."
             <199511120440.UAA03770@geli.clusternet> 
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 20:57:42 -0800
Message-ID: <14272.816152262@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> With my current 2-CPU setup, fvwm and exmh get launched off a single
> server, and apparently consume more than 100 child_proc PIDs apiece...
> 
> Jordan sets his to 400, maybe the default should be higher than 40?

No argument from me!

					Jordan