From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 16 12:14: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from po3.wam.umd.edu (po3.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.165]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6ACD37BAE5 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 12:13:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from howardjp@wam.umd.edu) Received: from rac2.wam.umd.edu (root@rac2.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.142]) by po3.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA17772; Tue, 16 May 2000 15:13:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rac2.wam.umd.edu (sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rac2.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA08222; Tue, 16 May 2000 15:13:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rac2.wam.umd.edu (howardjp@localhost) by rac2.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA08217; Tue, 16 May 2000 15:13:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200005161913.PAA08217@rac2.wam.umd.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: rac2.wam.umd.edu: howardjp owned process doing -bs To: Wes Peters Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mktemp() vs. mkstemp() In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 May 2000 11:46:25 MDT." <39218971.AE6779B5@softweyr.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 15:13:39 -0400 From: James Howard Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <39218971.AE6779B5@softweyr.com>, Wes Peters writes: > Drat, that's right. Anyone wanna pollute the kernel and filesystem > layers with a "reserve this filename" function? That sounds fugly, > doesn't it? That's why I suggested a simpler solution even I can code :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message