From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat May 17 04:43:04 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA21211
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 17 May 1997 04:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from X2296 (ppp6467.on.sympatico.ca [206.172.208.59])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA21201;
          Sat, 17 May 1997 04:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by X2296 (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA00770; Sat, 17 May 1997 07:42:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 17 May 1997 07:42:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tim Vanderhoek <tim@X2296>
Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org
To: Masafumi NAKANE <max@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: mcj@acquiesce.org, max@hub.freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/3146
In-Reply-To: <199705161201.FAA24340@hub.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970517073617.680A-100000@X2296>
X-OS: FreeBSD 2.2
X-Mailer: Pine
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 16 May 1997, Masafumi NAKANE wrote:

> Synopsis: new port fix (slrn)
> 
> We already have slnr in our ports collection.
> The only significant difference that the submitted port has is the contents of
> files/porting.notes.
> If slnr port in ports-current doesn't have any problem (well, it 
> shouldn't as the submitted one wasn't any different from it, though),

Watch out!  slrn := Simple Local Read News, slnr := Simple
Local Newsreader.  Slnr's claim to fame is that it can read
and create SOUP packets.  Slrn connects directly with
newservers...


--
tIM...HOEk
Whoever told you I had a .signature was lying.