From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 5 8:22:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from scientia.demon.co.uk (scientia.demon.co.uk [212.228.14.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72C337B9DB for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 08:22:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ben@scientia.demon.co.uk) Received: from strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk ([192.168.91.36] ident=exim) by scientia.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 12cpvx-0004Il-00; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 14:33:25 +0100 Received: (from ben) by strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk (Exim 3.12 #7) id 12cpvw-0000SY-00; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 14:33:24 +0100 Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 14:33:24 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst To: Michael Lucas Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fresh cvsup, make world, system too old for ports? Message-ID: <20000405143324.F66957@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> References: <20000405113255.B66957@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <200004051247.IAA80575@blackhelicopters.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200004051247.IAA80575@blackhelicopters.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Michael Lucas wrote: > This is a clean 4.0 system, installed as 4.0-release just last week, > and supped to -stable. It's not an upgrade from 3.x. > > Don't tell me we need a 4.0-release to 4.0-stable upgrade kit??? I > didn't see one on ftp2.freebsd.org yesterday. ah, OK, ignore me then. :-) All I can suggest is kludging around it for now, I'm not sure what the real solution is. # date +%Y%m%d > /var/db/port.mkversion -- Ben Smithurst / ben@scientia.demon.co.uk / PGP: 0x99392F7D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message