Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 19:40:12 GMT From: "Boris S." <bst2006@dva.dyndns.org> To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/106400: fatal trap 12 at restart of PF with ALTQ if ng0 device has detached Message-ID: <200612061940.kB6JeCMK040772@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/106400; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Boris S." <bst2006@dva.dyndns.org> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, bst2006@dva.dyndns.org, volker@vwsoft.com, glebius@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/106400: fatal trap 12 at restart of PF with ALTQ if ng0 device has detached Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 20:17:24 +0100 I use ALTQ primarily for priorizing tcp acks. Tell me if I'm wrong, but I think it is not possible to priorize TCP ACKS on encapsulated PPPoE data on the 'real' interface. Bandwidth limiting on ng0 works great if I left some bandwidth for the PPPoE overhead. Beside this, I can't currently limit the real interface, because the dsl-modem is connected in another room on the main LAN. I don't have a dedicated NIC for the modem. Boris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200612061940.kB6JeCMK040772>