From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 15:15:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D2616A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:15:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.tel.fer.hr (zg03-136.dialin.iskon.hr [213.191.135.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A68143D13 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:15:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zec@tel.fer.hr) Received: from 192.168.200.113 (marko@dhcp13.katoda.net [192.168.200.113]) by mail.tel.fer.hr (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id hB9NEPi3008345; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:14:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from zec@tel.fer.hr) From: Marko Zec To: Mooneer Salem , Mike K Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:14:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20031209073926.C6D5E43D09@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <1070998966.5649.6.camel@dell-ucsd.lifeafterking.org> In-Reply-To: <1070998966.5649.6.camel@dell-ucsd.lifeafterking.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312100014.39358.zec@tel.fer.hr> cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple Ips in Jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 23:15:24 -0000 On Tuesday 09 December 2003 20:42, Mooneer Salem wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 23:39, Mike K wrote: > > Anyone successfully get this to work in a working environment, not > > just install? > > I'm thinking that this would be a better solution for a virtual > hosting environment (once stabilized): > http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/vimage/. In any case, I've gotten it > working under VMWare using 5.0-RELEASE and am able to access the ^^^^^^^^^^^ Was this a typo or have you really succeeded in porting the patch to the 5.x branch? The original diffs are against 4.9-R, and when applied against -CURRENT they yield almost a complete reject. Cheers, Marko