Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 23:50:18 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 223578] [PATCH] devel/ncurses: do not pollute CFLAGS Message-ID: <bug-223578-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D223578 Bug ID: 223578 Summary: [PATCH] devel/ncurses: do not pollute CFLAGS Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Keywords: patch Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: swills@FreeBSD.org Reporter: jkim@FreeBSD.org Assignee: swills@FreeBSD.org Keywords: patch Flags: maintainer-feedback?(swills@FreeBSD.org) Created attachment 187891 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D187891&action= =3Dedit Do not add bogus macros to CFLAGS. Some ports cannot be built with devel/ncurses because "pkgconf --cflags ncurses" adds "-D_BSD_TYPES -D__BSD_VISIBLE -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=3D200112L -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=3D600" to CFLAGS via configure scripts. This may cause con= flicts with ports' own CFLAGS and/or CPPFLAGS. For example, see bug 211973, comme= nt 22. Actually, I found these flags are archaic from 5.x era and even harmful for all supported releases. I also verified that it generates the same binaries and works fine without the CFLAGS. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-223578-13>