From owner-freebsd-scsi Tue Feb 29 2:37:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from router.difi.de (router.difi.de [212.6.96.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3568C37BA9D for ; Tue, 29 Feb 2000 02:37:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from uwe.laverenz@difi.de) Received: from max.difi.de (max.difi.de [192.168.1.2]) by router.difi.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA42401 for ; Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:37:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uwe.laverenz@difi.de) Received: from difi.de (edv1.difi.de [192.168.1.54]) by max.difi.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA87649 for ; Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:37:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uwe.laverenz@difi.de) Message-ID: <38BBA179.6DE313AA@difi.de> Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:37:45 +0100 From: Uwe Laverenz Organization: DIFI Dierk Filmer GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Tandberg SLR-50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, one of our HP DDS3 streamers died recently and I'd like to replace both our HP-drives with 2 Tandberg SLR-50 streamers. I think the Tandbergs (drives and media) are far more robust and reliable. My questions: is this the right way to go under FreeBSD? Are there any known problems with these drives? What are your experiences? thanks in advance, uwe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message