From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 20 03:51:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB50B106566C; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:51:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thompsa@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pele.citylink.co.nz (pele.citylink.co.nz [202.8.44.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCDB8FC15; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:51:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thompsa@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pele.citylink.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D632FFF37; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:51:14 +1300 (NZDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at citylink.co.nz Received: from pele.citylink.co.nz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pele.citylink.co.nz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OeAI3gBOco9P; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:51:10 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from citylink.fud.org.nz (unknown [202.8.44.45]) by pele.citylink.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:51:10 +1300 (NZDT) Received: by citylink.fud.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 633C911428; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:51:10 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:51:10 -0800 From: Andrew Thompson To: Joe Marcus Clarke Message-ID: <20090220035110.GA3444@citylink.fud.org.nz> References: <20090220033740.GA903@citylink.fud.org.nz> <499E278D.7060406@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <499E278D.7060406@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: usb@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFR: usb switchover patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:51:16 -0000 On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:46:21PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > Andrew Thompson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > I have put together a proposed set of changes for moving USB2 to its > > permanent location. The layout has some differences to how it is right > > now so I am looking for feedback. > > What about libusb20? Will this name change, or is this the final name > (same question for the libusb20 functions)? I need to know for hal. > Thanks. As far as I know libusb20 will not change at all. Andrew