From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 12:33:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EA1DEC5; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (apnoea.adamw.org [204.109.59.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22D082A5; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from apnoea.adamw.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by apnoea.adamw.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E83011FE9F; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:32:52 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:32:52 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: Re: svn commit: r346114 - head/devel/p4.el In-Reply-To: <20140310072423.GC11693@FreeBSD.org> References: <201402260657.s1Q6vEsH059562@svn.freebsd.org> <20140226123420.f5c0d0ff40b404a70334da4b@FreeBSD.org> <20140310072423.GC11693@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: adamw@adamw.org User-Agent: banemail fence Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Mathieu Arnold , Emanuel Haupt X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:33:06 -0000 On 2014/03/10 03:24, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:34:20PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote: >> Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> > Taking one amongst many, the current practice is to mute the MKDIR >> > and not mute commands that install files. Would you mind respecting >> > that in the future ? > >> This is just a matter of opinion. I've always preferred to see what is >> being installed or what direcories are being created. Even the example >> in the PHB doesn't mute the mkdir. Unless this gets correcte in the >> PHB >> I won't change this. Alexey - You make this request every few days, it seems, and the response is always the same: it's not in the PHB. You should put it there. It SHOULD be policy. We should strive for consistency across ports. The ports tree should present a unified experience for all ports, for all users. # Adam --- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org http://www.adamw.org