Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:51:41 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org> Cc: maho@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/85820: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than SCHED_4BSD Message-ID: <45293AAD.9090205@mail.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <200610081720.k98HKkQx058984@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200610081720.k98HKkQx058984@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ceri Davies wrote: > Synopsis: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than SCHED_4BSD > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: ceri > State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 8 17:19:36 UTC 2006 > State-Changed-Why: > ULE is no longer the default scheduler, and no longer has a maintainer. > This is an interesting test case though. > > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-bugs > Responsible-Changed-By: ceri > Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Oct 8 17:19:36 UTC 2006 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Scheduler problem. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=85820 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Very interesting to read. And this is now the end of the newly introduced allround weapon for more scalability?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45293AAD.9090205>