From owner-freebsd-current Fri Nov 6 11:26:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA16953 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 11:26:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA16948 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 11:26:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 0zbrVP-0006OJ-00; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 11:25:11 -0800 Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 11:25:09 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Brian Feldman cc: Cory Kempf , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bad time slicing? Priorities? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 6 Nov 1998, Brian Feldman wrote: > You don't really understand the scheduling. Nice the xgalaga to 0 or -1, > and try again. Plus, rc5des is running on BOTH CPU's (FreeBSD splits it of > course and switches them around to have the best performance), FreeBSD is > not "magic". > > Brian Feldman Yes, and rc5des should probably be run under idprio. No matter how much you "nice" a process it will still be run, even if other processes are waiting. Howerver, a idprio process only runs when idle. A idprio process may never run at all if your system never has idle time. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message