From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 25 02:01:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C1C1065675 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 02:01:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8238FC16 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 02:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so341307wer.13 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 19:01:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=/GUk/OTAowBURzemdWjjkKbEoy7kUl9rnCUkFqxw9qQ=; b=GrReImKMM/lW1K1Th5q79A4qHhCpDr3MwlwB9nRhgrnDF9uh6fbcMiW1IuV1IheqZT 7vCOiAUOI+n1R62GCxELWgDboQGhG0fzN5e4ThTZD4Y3n1jG3IGuZ2hB8TA9g3UixmDs V+JGNZa6GFK09VtxmRpeggbRX01xkPy8gOoac= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=/GUk/OTAowBURzemdWjjkKbEoy7kUl9rnCUkFqxw9qQ=; b=Co6zdCIXJ1cfiLR4TVoaBXL/kJxD9JnTjLH7XBI52qgpY4NY/bD9tVLyOOV1t98o6O wYQKhfp5+PbmpeIS3ZW5lclfD7t4Mr/r356UsNaM5apzAi75UjHAbdJeU4sjuZ9J/sVg sxezm/wCUpy+7duhA2OGADBxr0pPTBCOiYu/K5VEZkSdngSxvgzEWjYVXc6cgxbFaSkz ibg0DjtyiLNls5ovZCPCIloU/Y6CnjSkp0TsgBIGmMHIaEtje13K0RGBqy6kPO6cLnTB FMjgQPKpN4acO/vdXHjRU1zM1PdFuNYmYHBrWl+7uAJKhlfj9xYc512Qk9Ueigz3kdpT Eypg== Received: by 10.216.212.157 with SMTP id y29mr837489weo.146.1337911293078; Thu, 24 May 2012 19:01:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lists@eitanadler.com Received: by 10.223.85.202 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 19:01:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201205210632.q4L6WPI9081702@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120521143623.34087c13.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4FB9E411.9030500@FreeBSD.org> <20120521070444.GG63744@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 19:01:02 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: XVQVS_xyeL4gqpuzMzeCG6ve-80 Message-ID: To: araujo@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmYloNdlhk1dm/K5rkLeptFm8yApRNAi8PMQdfUYxQeOAmkdbFkIJ9sssPU/XFzcIa0ylsH Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , miwi@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Dmitry Sivachenko , cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/haproxy Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 02:01:47 -0000 On 24 May 2012 18:13, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > No, is not necessary ask portmgr or secteam to approve if it is a security > update. The Ports Management Team reserves the right to revoke or override anyone's maintainership for any reason, and the Security Officer Team reserves the right to revoke or override maintainership for security reasons. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-maintainer.html -- Eitan Adler Source & Ports committer X11, Bugbusting teams