From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 17 11:25:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D16CCC4A; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AD4EE53; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3l5scf3MPGzbHN; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:25:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V3bAqgtHtV3N; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:25:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from marvin.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:25:36 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <55080F30.9010104@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:25:36 +0100 From: Guido Falsi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremie Le Hen Subject: Re: net/unison240 depends on lang/ocaml-nox11 References: <5507555C.7030508@FreeBSD.org> <5507F80F.70609@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:25:43 -0000 On 03/17/15 11:44, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Guido Falsi wrote: >> On 03/17/15 09:31, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Guido Falsi wrote: >>>> On 03/16/15 22:37, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: >>>>> Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree :o). >>>>> >>>>> Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I never noticed this since it never happened to me and nobody else >>>> reported it. >>>> >>>> Anyway now that you draw my attention, yes, it needs fixing. >>>> >>>> Your patch looks correct, but please allow me a little time for some >>>> testing. >>> >>> OK thanks! :) >> >> Just committed it. Thanks again for reporting the issue! > > Thanks! > > I don't want to abuse your time, but "make checksum" is broken on > net/unison240 :). > Looks like distfiles were rerolled. 2.48 has the same problem. Will commit updated checksums shortly! Thanks again. -- Guido Falsi