Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 03 Jun 2021 18:27:46 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 256393] Issue with recreation of ppp/tun interfaces
Message-ID:  <bug-256393-7501-A2I02MD4Ky@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-256393-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-256393-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256393

Eugene Grosbein <eugen@freebsd.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ae@FreeBSD.org,
                   |                            |eugen@freebsd.org,
                   |                            |melifaro@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #4 from Eugene Grosbein <eugen@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to Nathan Whitehorn from comment #3)

> My suspicion is that the actual problem is that some of the routing-table=
 verification code that went in recently is preventing adding an IP address=
 with an address to which there is already a route on another interface.

If such "verification" was really added, it is wrong and must be corrected.
Only PINNED routes should remain intact, other routes should be replaceable=
 by
daemons like ppp or net/mpd5 or alike even if they were already added by so=
me
routing daemons.

Adding some more eyes to the CC of this PR.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-256393-7501-A2I02MD4Ky>