From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 8 05:04:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33973106575A; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 05:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.64.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6F58FC14; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 05:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9854K6I066739; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 09:04:20 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9854Kv6066738; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 09:04:20 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 09:04:20 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Adrian Chadd Message-ID: <20121008050420.GO34622@FreeBSD.org> References: <201210061002.q96A2BFf039772@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD Net , svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r241245 - in head: . share/man/man9 sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet sys/net sys/netinet sys/netpfil/ipfw sys/netpfil/pf sys/sys X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 05:04:22 -0000 On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 06:49:51PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: A> Hi, A> A> People have been reporting this: A> A> A> Oct 7 18:35:19 alix kernel: in_cksum_skip: out of data by 53295 A> Oct 7 18:35:19 alix kernel: in_cksum_skip: out of data by 55335 A> A> Would you please investigate this, or back the patch out? I'm working on it. A> Also, if this is actually due to this patch - why is it that you A> didn't pick it up in testing? Because this debugging printf is only on i386, not on amd64. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.