From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 17 10:33:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA19618 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 10:33:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from milf18.bus.net (milf18.bus.net [207.41.25.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA19588 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 10:32:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cao@bus.net) Received: from localhost (cao@localhost) by milf18.bus.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA02149 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 13:32:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from cao@bus.net) X-Authentication-Warning: milf18.bus.net: cao owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 13:32:39 -0500 (EST) From: "Chuck O'Donnell" Reply-To: "Chuck O'Donnell" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I need a strategy for making my STABLE installation stable Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Tue, 17 Feb 1998, Benedict Stockebrand wrote: > "Victor Ponomarev" writes: > > > Hardware: [...] Adaptec 2940 Ultra (BIOS 1997), > > > > [snip] > > > > 2) I took a old AHA 2940 Ultra from my friend (BIOS 1996) . > > Well! All is fine. But I'm not sure that trasfer rate was 20 Mbps on > > SCSI bus. > > Could it be that the old one was a 2940 U but the new one a 2940 AU? > IIRC the OpenBSD people had some nasty surprises with that --- the old > 2940 U works, but the 2940 AU uses a "simplified" chipset and didn't > work with their 2940 U-based drivers. > I would concur with this. I have a number of 2940U boards that worked fine, but I had to shelve an Adaptec 2940AU until the ahc driver was updated (in 2.2.5 ?). The 2940AU works great now (2.2.5-RELEASE and 2.2.5-STABLE). Chuck To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message