From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 4 23:42:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA25429 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:42:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA25393 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:42:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA00677; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:06:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from toor) Message-Id: <199803050406.XAA00677@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: silo overflows (Was Re: 3.0-RELEASE?) In-Reply-To: <199803050338.TAA05622@implode.root.com> from David Greenman at "Mar 4, 98 07:38:30 pm" To: dg@root.com Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 23:06:10 -0500 (EST) Cc: mike@smith.net.au, dmaddox@scsn.net, evanc@synapse.net, Matthew.Thyer@dsto.defence.gov.au, shimon@simon-shapiro.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG From: "John S. Dyson" Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David Greenman said: > >> Add this to your system conf: > >> > >> options "MSIZE=256" > > > >Interesting; why change the mbuf size? Is this a recommended change > >for general operation, or is 128 bytes still preferred? > > You don't want to do that. Without other changes, our networking code > behaves poorly when MSIZE is not 128. > I agree, that was a mistake on my part. -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message