Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:53:01 +0100
From:      Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu>
To:        "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Showing CDP info in ifconfig?
Message-ID:  <52D508FD.3010709@fsn.hu>
In-Reply-To: <D9AB077C-F6DC-4A00-89E7-FEA8CFFF918F@lists.zabbadoz.net>
References:  <52D50065.8060907@fsn.hu> <D9AB077C-F6DC-4A00-89E7-FEA8CFFF918F@lists.zabbadoz.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/14/14 10:31, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 14 Jan 2014, at 09:16 , Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Anybody thought about how useful would be showing CDP info in ifconfig output?
> No.  Neither would lldp or other protocols.  That’s what a higher level management user interface is for.  I’d be happy to finally see someone do this in an abstracted way so it could be a cli, a Web interface, or some xml-rpc thingy or whatever is the standard of the day.
> ifconfig is not the place, especially since it would have to query a daemon running somewhere else anyway.  Otherwise we’ll end up with ndp, ospf, isis, bgp, ipsec, and the apache, varnish, and squid status there as well.
>
I'm not sure how this could be done efficiently, without any ill 
effects, but yes, it's likely that doing it in userspace is a safer way.
With CDP you have to capture just one packet, parse it and update the 
values, with some of the examples, this is not the case. :)
But I got the point.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52D508FD.3010709>