From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Nov 11 21:18:23 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id VAA24512
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 11 Nov 1995 21:18:23 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA24507
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 11 Nov 1995 21:18:21 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA14334; Sat, 11 Nov 1995 21:16:27 -0800
To: Sandy Kovshov <sandy@Lapkin.RoSprint.ru>
cc: root@gateway.net.hk (System Administrator), jgreco@solaria.sol.net,
        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Odd crash after inode depletion.. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 12 Nov 1995 07:52:11 +0300."
             <199511120452.HAA04406@Lapkin.RoSprint.ru> 
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 21:16:27 -0800
Message-ID: <14332.816153387@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> I've got this message. Then system destroys my / partition. I also 
> believe that was'nt a bug. I think it is nice feature added in kernel. ;)

I have a hard time believing that the two are related.  I've exhausted
inodes on our news server quite a few times (and on some of my own
machines) without any data corruption whatsoever.

Be careful making assertions like this if you're not *really sure*
that a relationship exists.  I do not see any of the investigative
work required to prove this one way or another given here.

					Jordan