From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 30 15:14:33 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA01473 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 15:14:33 -0800 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id PAA01465 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 15:14:21 -0800 Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA15062 (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Thu, 30 Mar 1995 17:05:40 -0600 Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA07926; 30 Mar 95 16:37:21 CST (Thu) Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id QAA07923; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 16:37:20 -0600 From: Peter da Silva Message-Id: <199503302237.QAA07923@bonkers.taronga.com> Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system. To: fbsd@clem.systemsix.com (Steve Passe) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1995 16:37:18 -0600 (CST) Cc: paul@isl.cf.ac.uk, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199503301743.KAA20983@clem.systemsix.com> from "Steve Passe" at Mar 30, 95 10:43:10 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 278 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk It seems to be odd to be calling the easy to use documentation the "advanced" documentation package. Yes, from our vendor viewpoint that's what it is, but it really should be given a friendlier name. Would *you* install an "advanced" documentation package if you were a newbie?