From owner-cvs-all Sat Dec 23 10:15:30 2000 From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 23 10:15:26 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from picalon.gun.de (picalon.gun.de [192.109.159.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0FC37B400; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 10:15:24 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by picalon.gun.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA21999; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 19:15:19 +0100 (MET) >Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eBNI36w87001; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 19:03:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 19:03:06 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Andreas Klemm , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/apsfilter6 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist Message-ID: <20001223190306.A86928@titan.klemm.gtn.com> References: <200012231405.eBNE5DW72977@freefall.freebsd.org> <20001223062105.A9885@citusc.usc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001223062105.A9885@citusc.usc.edu>; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 06:21:05AM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE SMP X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 06:21:05AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 06:05:12AM -0800, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > andreas 2000/12/23 06:05:12 PST > > > > Modified files: > > print/apsfilter6 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist > > Log: > > new apsfilter-STABLE release: V 6.0.0 > > updated PORTREVISION > > updated pkg_plist > > completely replaces old apsfilter-STABLE release, > > so the 5.4.2 port has been removed by me. > > Why is this port named apsfilter6, not apsfilter according to the > usual port naming conventions? its the same like with tcl, ghostscript and other ports. apsfilter was the name I started with. Then I had to add a port for apsfilter version 6. Both ports had to live in parallel for a longer period. > And why did you set PORTREVISION to 1 - Because the port didn't have a PORTREVISION set previously and I decided to start the next revision with "1". > have you read the guidelines for PORTREVISION in the porter's > handbook? I read it a few weeks ago when I first came in touch with this new variable. After a few weeks I was happy to remember, that this has to be bumped, if a major change occurs to the port. I did so and whats wrong now ? Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm Powered by FreeBSD SMP Songs from our band >>64Bits<<............http://www.apsfilter.org/64bits.html My homepage................................ http://people.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas Please note: Apsfilter got a NEW HOME................http://www.apsfilter.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message