From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sun Nov  2 00:30:03 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA08822
          for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 2 Nov 1997 00:30:03 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA08805;
          Sun, 2 Nov 1997 00:30:01 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 00:30:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199711020830.AAA08805@hub.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs
Cc: 
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Subject: Re: bin/4916: Bad parameters to ifconfig cause kernel panic 
Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The following reply was made to PR bin/4916; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
To: toasty@dragondata.com
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: bin/4916: Bad parameters to ifconfig cause kernel panic 
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 1997 00:27:07 -0800

 "Bad, bad parameter!" <whack!>
 
 This bug report is highly bogus.  Where's the actual example?  Saying
 "bad parameter" is in the same category as saying "my computer doesn't
 work, help!" as far as general uselessness goes and filling in the
 Description or How-To-Repeat sections would really have been a good
 idea.  Unless you've more to add to it, I'll close this PR as invalid
 in the next couple of days.