Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 09:20:49 GMT From: NAKATA@FreeBSD.org, Maho <maho@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/85372: repocopy request: openoffice.org Message-ID: <200508280920.j7S9Knsj096672@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200508280930.j7S9UIIo021790@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 85372
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: repocopy request: openoffice.org
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Sun Aug 28 09:30:18 GMT 2005
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: NAKATA, Maho
>Release: 5.4-RELEASE
>Organization:
FreeBSD.org
>Environment:
FreeBSD satie.private.org 5.4-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p3 #0: Fri Jul 8 14:23:40 JST 2005 maho@satie.private.org:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MAHO i386
>Description:
I'm maintaining openoffice.org port in the ports tree
o openoffice.org (or OOo) 2.0 release is approaching. we need openoffice.org-2.0 port as well. At the moment OOo 2.0beta2 is available and I have already
made one and tested on 5.4-RELEASE. we still need 2.0-devel because
2.0.1 will appear.
o we have ports named as openoffice-1.0, 1.1, 1.1-devel, 2.0-devel
but name of these software is openoffice.org and not openoffice. so please rename to correct name.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
summary of request:
editors/openoffice-2.0-devel -> editors/openoffice.org-2.0
editors/openoffice-2.0-devel -> editors/openoffice.org-2.0-devel
editors/openoffice-1.1-devel -> editors/openoffice.org-1.1-devel
editors/openoffice-1.1 -> editors/openoffice.org-1.1
editors/openoffice-1.0 -> editors/openoffice.org-1.0
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200508280920.j7S9Knsj096672>