From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 22:49:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D24106564A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:49:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394F58FC0A for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so2390263ewy.13 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.14.146 with SMTP id g18mr2956290eba.18.1289083796095; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:49:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.65 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 15:49:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101106203929.GE13095@guilt.hydra> References: <4CD45A11.7060002@stillbilde.net> <20101105213433.GC8648@guilt.hydra> <4CD4D8A9.8030900@too1337.com> <20101106161636.GD12418@guilt.hydra> <4CD58C7A.70609@stillbilde.net> <20101106203929.GE13095@guilt.hydra> From: Chris Brennan Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:49:33 -0400 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 22:49:58 -0000 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:20:39PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) < > > svein-listmail@stillbilde.net> wrote: > > > > > > Chad, what are these attachments to your e-mail? My client keeps > > > flagging > > > > your mail as questionable and I'm sandboxing it to make sure it's > nothing > > > > bad :D > > > > > > I suppose they are the PGP signature? > > > > You could suppose that but I'm on a windows machine at the moment so not > > going to risk it and ... your attachment shows as a PGP Signature ... his > > didn't, just 'noname' for the file name.... > > That supposition is correct. I find it odd that someone else's signature > is labeled as such and mine is not for you; for me, I see mine labeled as > PGP signatures as well. I'm currently using GnuPG with Mutt; I don't > know if that makes a difference. > > Shouldn't .... but just to be clear .... Chad's signature-attachement is claimed to be safe! And the answer is 42. Did you know... If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, but what's worse is when you play it forward.... ...it installs Windows 2000 -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org > -- > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] >