Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 Jul 2020 19:30:12 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        enlightenment@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   E on FreeBSD: [Bug 245594] devel/efl: Update to 1.23.3
Message-ID:  <bug-245594-33756-dfEtui4Iqh@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-245594-33756@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-245594-33756@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245594

--- Comment #41 from Peter TKATCHENKO <peter@flytrace.com> ---
I finished updating the principal Enlightenment ports in my Github repo
https://github.com/Peter2121/freebsd-ports :
- devel/efl
- x11-wm/enlightenment
- x11/terminology
- multimedia/rage

Some enlightenment-related ports were removed:
- x11-wm/e-module-alarm/
- x11-wm/e-module-cpu/
- x11-wm/e-module-deskshow/
- x11-wm/e-module-everything-places/
- x11-wm/e-module-mem/
- x11-wm/e-module-rmb/
- x11-wm/e-module-wlan/
- x11-wm/e-modules/
There is no reason to build internal modules separated from Enlightenment, it
is not supported in mainstream. Additional modules (if any) can be updated by
their developers.

Some EFL ports still need tests/patches (editors/ecrire, graphics/ephoto). I'm
working on it. I hope to be able to add another EFL ports (devel/edi and
sysutils/evisum) soon.

Four principal ports work for me, I think that they can be committed 'as is'.
If I should do something more - please tell me. If not - please, commit them.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-245594-33756-dfEtui4Iqh>