From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Mar 28 11:41:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA28963 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 11:41:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.crl.com (mail.crl.com [165.113.1.22]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA28955 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 11:41:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mixcom.mixcom.com by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA01075 (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for ); Fri, 28 Mar 1997 11:40:14 -0800 Received: by mixcom.mixcom.com (8.6.12/2.2) id NAA05688; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 13:41:29 -0600 Received: from p75.mixcom.com(198.137.186.25) by mixcom.mixcom.com via smap (V1.3) id sma005665; Fri Mar 28 19:41:17 1997 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970328133318.00c1d794@mixcom.com> X-Sender: sysop@mixcom.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 13:33:18 -0600 To: Dan Wolfe From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: RE: Receive time on email messages Cc: questions@freebsd.org, ejs@bfd.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 06:34 PM 3/27/97 -0500, Dan Wolfe wrote: >Jeff, > >You are right. This might be a Windows Messaging problem. When I look at the messages themselves, the received time is correct. However, in the Inbox listing of message headers, the time is incorrect. Any ideas on this one? Yuck! Sorry, but MS really needs to read the RFCs and I cannot stand MS apps for the net. The only was at one time I was forced to use Exchange for network mail, but I kept Eudora for mail. and to economize: At 04:55 PM 3/27/97 -0800, Eric J. Schwertfeger wrote: >On Thu, 27 Mar 1997, Dan Wolfe wrote: >It is a Windows Messaging problem, and the problem also exists in earlier >versions of the same program. In fact, I was hoping that this would be >one of the things fixed when the Exchange update came out, but the most >noticable thing was the change in name :-) Of course the fact that we can >now send and receive larger emails is nice, but it's still nothing >compared to what I can send and receive with pine. Eudora 3.0 will not break messages until they hit 1000K, which is better than the 64K chunks I used to see and I get some very large reports at times or send files as messages. What I would like to see is mail used for mail, attachments are ok, but customers that use mail as the transport for large files should learn about serv-u ftpd. Worst case was a 40Mb attachment. Two very evil things were: one, a return receipt (a no no for attchments); and they worked in the same office!!! Guess they learned about LANs or PC-PC transfers, cause customer or not, I bitched. I'll step down now. 8-) ------------------------------------------- Jeff Mountin - System/Network Administrator jeff@mixcom.net MIX Communications Serving the Internet since 1990