Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:26:08 +0800
From:      Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com>
To:        Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Cc:        Aurelien Nephtali <aurelien.nephtali@wanadoo.fr>
Subject:   Re: 'sort' tool is eating my system ressources
Message-ID:  <c21e92e2040728022655bdfae8@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040728083252.GA72137@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
References:  <20040728081719.GA17127@nebula.wanadoo.fr> <20040728083252.GA72137@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:32:52 +0100, Matthew Seaman
<m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:
> Sounds like portupgrade is building an INDEX file.  You'll see a
> message about running 'portsdb -Uu' if it is.  What you've seen is
> pretty much the expected impact I'd expect from doing that.
> 
> You should be able to download a recently build INDEX file by running
> 
>    # make fetchindex
> 
> before starting your portupgrade -- it's about 6Mb.  After doing that
> portupgrade will only need to run 'portsdb -u' which is a lot lighter
> weight.
> 
> Although if your system can build the INDEX file in 5 minutes, you
> might as well let it do that.  Takes more like 20 minutes on my
> machine.
> 
>        Cheers,
> 
>        Matthew
I recommend highly sysutils/portindex, which does incremental builds
and takes very little time to build new INDEX, INDEX-5.

Jiawei Ye



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c21e92e2040728022655bdfae8>