From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Tue Jul 19 20:42:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5A8B9E442 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 20:42:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BB6C13E5 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 20:42:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u6JKghl8012120 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 20:42:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211152] benchmarks/iozone: Build fails on typedef redefinition with different types ('long long' vs '__off64_t' (aka 'long')) Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 20:42:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: markmi@dsl-only.net X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 20:42:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211152 --- Comment #34 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to w.schwarzenfeld from comment #33) It may be appropriate to also consider the sscanf issues and alternatives indicated in: https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/c/INT05-C.+Do+not+use+= input+functions+to+convert+character+data+if+they+cannot+handle+all+possibl= e+inputs sscanf is not good for handling/avoiding problems in the text being convert= ed well. Has anyone contacted the upstream author ( capps@iozone.org ) to see what t= heir criteria are for changes to go upstream? For example: what range of vintage= s of C are to be supported? That criteria might eliminate what I reference above= for changes going upstream for all I know. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=