From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 19 04:10:01 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD46B16A4CE
	for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 04:10:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smta05.mail.ozemail.net (smta05.mail.ozemail.net
	[203.103.165.90])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE43E43D3F
	for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 04:10:00 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from joe.shevland@e-wise.com)
Received: from AMADAN ([203.102.246.65]) by smta05.mail.ozemail.net
          with SMTP
          id <20040319120933.YKPC6056.smta05.mail.ozemail.net@AMADAN>
          for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:09:33 +0000
From: "Joe Shevland" <joe.shevland@e-wise.com>
To: <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 23:10:01 +1100
Message-ID: <JDEJKBDPOMEJIPCEMEJFMEMJCFAA.joe.shevland@e-wise.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
In-Reply-To: <JDEJKBDPOMEJIPCEMEJFOEMICFAA.joe.shevland@e-wise.com>
Subject: RE: tomcat41 producing 28 java daemons
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:10:01 -0000

I guess my latest bugbear (bikeshed? God forbid I start an argument
like -CURRENT has been seeing lately (and sorry if I'm taking a liberty if
religious facets get to you, I'm pretty agnostic/aetheist), is uniform
handling of Java libraries... whats happening on this front? This is a more
a knee-jerk posting and I haven't googled etc .. I'm not necessarily
apologizing about that, some ppl get too concerned about backtracking
instead of welcoming a new discussion ... but I've got a few ideas if the
forum is open to them.