From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 20 14:40:37 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E4616A4CE
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server.rucus.ru.ac.za (server.rucus.ru.ac.za [146.231.115.1])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33CD143D4C
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from oxo@rucus.ru.ac.za)
Received: (qmail 43984 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2004 21:40:32 -0000
Received: from shell-em0.rucus.ru.ac.za (oxo@10.0.0.1)
  by server-em0.rucus.ru.ac.za with QMQP; 20 Apr 2004 21:40:32 -0000
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 23:40:32 +0200
From: John Oxley <oxo@rucus.ru.ac.za>
To: questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040420214032.GC19849@rucus.ru.ac.za>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Subject: : Re: Using portsupgrade with make arguments
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 21:40:38 -0000

I apologise that I have lost the In-Reply-To: Field, but here is my question.

 On Tue 2004-04-20 (21:23), dev@eth0.ch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just to get it clear for me: If I upgrade a port that has been
> originally
> installed with additional make arguments I must include them again. Is
> the
> following correct?
>
> Original installation:
> # make arg_1=val_1 arg_2=arg_2 install clean
>
> Upgrading port using portupgrade:
> # portupgrade -R -m "arg_1=val_1 arg_2=arg_2" port
 [snip]

 on this note, if I change /etc/make.conf to
 .if ${.CURDIR} == "/usr/ports/my/port"
 arg_1=val_1
 arg_2=val_2
 .endif

 cd /usr/ports/my/port
 make install clean

 then later, I portupgrade that port, will portupgrade use the options from
 /etc/make.conf

 -Ox

 --
 /~\ The ASCII           ASCII stupid question, get a EBCDIC ANSI.
 \ / Ribbon Campaign     John Oxley
  X  Against HTML        http://oxo.rucus.net/
 / \ Email!              oxo <at> rucus.ru.ac.za
 "Personally, I'd rather pay for my freedom than live in a bitmapped,
 pop-up-happy dungeon like NT."
 		-- Thomas Scoville