From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Dec 9 01:59:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861D6E96E75 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 01:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E0C96E47A for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 01:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.89 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1eNUQK-000EDQ-Un; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 02:59:28 +0100 Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 02:59:28 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Chris H Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check Message-ID: <20171209015928.GW2827@home.opsec.eu> References: <56f7eaad9cfcc5da32935708d0599a49@udns.ultimatedns.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56f7eaad9cfcc5da32935708d0599a49@udns.ultimatedns.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 01:59:25 -0000 Hi! > > > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and > > > replace it with dma(1). > Hmm. This does not come as good news to me. I've been working on an antispam > system that targets the use of Sendmail, If sendmail is available via ports, wouldn't that be enough ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go !