Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:17:01 +0100
From:      Dirk Engling <erdgeist@erdgeist.org>
Cc:        freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Proposal ipv6_addrs_common
Message-ID:  <4F31406D.5020304@erdgeist.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120207.232417.487789017555472392.hrs@allbsd.org>
References:  <20120207.072925.1861639312875773760.hrs@allbsd.org> <4F3088C8.9090505@erdgeist.org> <20120207.170255.161251905285915806.hrs@allbsd.org> <20120207.232417.487789017555472392.hrs@allbsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07.02.12 15:24, Hiroki Sato wrote:

> Comments are welcome.  I am moving onto implementing address range 
> expansion to this framework.

Before looking deeper into your patch I'd suggest that we also
consollidate the handler for ipv4_addrs_IF into ifalias_af_common and
deprecate it. Makes sense?

  erdgeist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAk8xQG0ACgkQuN1wFypsMNMakACeIJMHh3EpW8pQTeMurchnhiLP
4e8AnRHplBGVw6putTVovkPuVIHm2JMG
=vX8l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F31406D.5020304>