From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 14:53:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F2016A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:53:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from havoc.eusc.inter.net (havoc.eusc.inter.net [213.73.101.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418E143D45 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:53:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) Received: from dial-76-183.de.inter.net ([213.73.76.183] helo=current.best-eng.de) by havoc.eusc.inter.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #3) id 1BfJym-0006sZ-00 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:53:00 +0200 Received: from current.best-eng.de (localhost.best-eng.de [127.0.0.1]) by current.best-eng.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5TEqxTR001025 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:52:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from matthias@current.best-eng.de) Received: by current.best-eng.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5TEqgeF001010 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:52:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from matthias) From: Matthias Schuendehuette Organization: Micro$oft-free Zone To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:52:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E86E71@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> In-Reply-To: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E86E71@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406291652.41916.msch@snafu.de> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:37:48 +0000 Subject: Re: Q's about IBM TSM X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: msch@snafu.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:53:02 -0000 On Tuesday 29 June 2004 16:38, Will Saxon wrote: > > Casually mention that Veritas NetBackup supports FreeBSD and you > > were wondering what the migration path might be :) > > It does? Under Linux emu I guess? I loosely followed the discussion here and like to mention, that I'm running HP's OmniBack/DataProtector 5.1 Linux-Client perfectly under FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 and 5.2-CURRENT. I circumvented the 'semi-chroot' environment of the linux emulation with local NFS-Mounts of /, /usr and /var (/tmp let aside) under /FreeBSD, /FreeBSD/usr and /FreeBSD/var. The /FreeBSD-tree is seen by the linux-client and so I'm also able to restore into these directories. So far, I found no drawbacks of this solution... maybe this is possible with other backup clients too. -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F