From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Jun 2 12:19:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3859B63E31 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 12:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jk@kornberger.name) Received: from digineo.de (mail.digineo.de [185.55.116.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC0F1B9E for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 12:19:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jk@kornberger.name) Received: from [172.16.0.108] (82-198-197-71.briteline.de [82.198.197.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jk) by digineo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4EAD660288 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 14:19:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: IPFW: table support for MAC addresses? To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <574D89F6.3030806@kornberger.name> From: "Julian K." Message-ID: <57502430.1030309@kornberger.name> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 14:18:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <574D89F6.3030806@kornberger.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 12:19:10 -0000 Hi, is there anyone who wants to use MAC based rules with IPFW? I want to build a captive portal that also supports IPv6. MAC addresses in IPFW tables would help a lot. Regards, Julian On 31.05.2016 14:56, Julian K. wrote: > Hi, > > I studied the IPFW improvements in FreeBSD 11. Unfortunately I can't > find a way to put MAC addresses in IPFW tables. > Are there any plans to build support for it in the upcoming release? > > Regards, > Julian