From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Mar 30 15:15:51 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA01540 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 15:15:51 -0800
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id PAA01533 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 15:15:45 -0800
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA15047
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Thu, 30 Mar 1995 17:04:59 -0600
Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA07577; 30 Mar 95 16:26:59 CST (Thu)
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id QAA07574; Thu, 30 Mar 1995 16:26:58 -0600
From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com>
Message-Id: <199503302226.QAA07574@bonkers.taronga.com>
Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system.
To: paul@isl.cf.ac.uk (Paul Richards)
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1995 16:26:57 -0600 (CST)
Cc: fbsd@clem.systemsix.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199503300945.KAA23847@isl.cf.ac.uk> from "Paul Richards" at Mar 30, 95 10:45:15 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 370       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> The issue is whether our documentation should require a httpd to be
> running in order to read them properly.

I don't think anyone has suggested that would be the case.

HOWEVER.

I was just talking to Karl Lehenbauer, and he's done a 350 line Tcl
http server that he says we can have... it's cute... it does all the stuff
internally, like the whole site is cgi-bin.