From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Jul 31 16:30:44 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EF85B14E2B; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 16:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA82025;
	Sat, 31 Jul 1999 17:29:05 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id RAA94627; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 17:31:09 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199907312331.RAA94627@harmony.village.org>
To: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de>
Subject: Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... 
Cc: Ben Rosengart <ben@skunk.org>,
	"Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	"Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 31 Jul 1999 19:34:10 +0200."
		<19990731193410.C18402@cicely8.cicely.de> 
References: <19990731193410.C18402@cicely8.cicely.de>  <19990731190814.A18402@cicely8.cicely.de> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907311316430.94119-100000@penelope.skunk.org> 
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 17:31:09 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <19990731193410.C18402@cicely8.cicely.de> Bernd Walter writes:
: Maybe a set of sysctls with a switch to off only behavour would be a
: better way.

Actually, a better way would be to have the interfaces to the network
stack that would handle this stuff w/o needing to resort to bpf.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message