From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun Aug 10 20:34:59 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA05795
          for chat-outgoing; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 20:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu (devnull@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu [128.52.46.64])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA05790
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 20:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu (8.8.5/8.6.12GNU) id XAA04779; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 23:34:36 -0400
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 23:34:36 -0400
Message-Id: <199708110334.XAA04779@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
From: "Joel N. Weber II" <devnull@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
To: sef@Kithrup.COM
CC: chat@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <199708101740.KAA17289@kithrup.com> (message from Sean Eric Fagan
	on Sun, 10 Aug 1997 10:40:59 -0700)
Subject: Re: variable sized arrays and gcc
x-url: http://www.red-bean.com/~nemo
x-attribution: nemo
x-foobar: If you can distinguish between good and bad advice, you don't need advice.
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

   Variardic macros and 'inline' are also going to be in the next ANSI C
   standard.

About time to standardize `inline'; I've been using it in my portable
code for a while.  (OTOH, I rely on autoconf to do `#define inline'
on compilers that don't support it.)