Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:08:51 -0700
From:      Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com>
To:        Waitman Gobble <gobble.wa@gmail.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Why Clang
Message-ID:  <CAOgwaMvC_z_n7_ARU0j2C7Rssx8SnxAw_WcfBEYgtJp15x1xNQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFuo_fwgVC9QHd2o3nWYqYnd3-VkSq%2BPMp14XhdjLKjLgzgSAw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org> <CAFuo_fwgVC9QHd2o3nWYqYnd3-VkSq%2BPMp14XhdjLKjLgzgSAw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Waitman Gobble <gobble.wa@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jun 6, 2012 10:32 AM, "Thomas D. Dean" <tomdean@speakeasy.org> wrote:
> >
> > Has the discussion on why change to clang been made available?
> >
> > I would like to know the reasoning.
> >
> > Or, is it simply a gratuitous  change?
> >
> > Tom Dean
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
> i believe it at least partially has to do with license. FreeBSD does not
> "ship" (maybe correct word?) with any GPLv3 licensed software.
>
> Waitman Gobble
> San Jose California USA
>


Because  commercial companies using FreeBSD in their proprietary products
are NOT willing to use
GPL v3 licensed software due to severe restrictions which commercial
companies can NOT fulfill in their proprietary products .

If FreeBSD uses GPL v3 software in its production , it will lost commercial
company  supporters and users base .

This my understanding from previously read messages .

Thank you very much .

Mehmet Erol Sanliturk



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOgwaMvC_z_n7_ARU0j2C7Rssx8SnxAw_WcfBEYgtJp15x1xNQ>