From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 26 13:38:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC9E1065672; Wed, 26 May 2010 13:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE4C8FC17; Wed, 26 May 2010 13:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj21 with SMTP id 21so280671gwj.13 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 06:38:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5mP5FKq+6a3yeOVdwmX7qpLdrTSG+PhgLSxLOlvuWeM=; b=Y0MqOMrmvv2IizzhiIa4OUKZ4Eij6perG7ELdJeBE2h+BB671ypH9qo/KSD1IKkZrE 1FZKNZ7CBGGhkH2eiMix/bUge97l5iUpQ9oGU2GJW83O51InEpABU5rCPJxHviSl29s9 /rYDB4OTZ/t8jYLJmSs3cinjbtu7W5Ser7BtU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wbiNbqW5fMvl6r1HehD+Zemj4oK6Voq6pw3ztui7S94w3mEE3XRoWI9IYz2nZ+B/s2 oeK6BHCsrY2LP7GnZv5PUJdNHoZwTp/RelWaJ89PlVbfK6L9FzyRq9bPdIYxDzqsJDH2 1WuBlriZ+QEUGQAWIwUyradgoeKRFtWKlPN64= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.194.196 with SMTP id dz4mr6631588ibb.66.1274881083233; Wed, 26 May 2010 06:38:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.182.204 with HTTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 06:38:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BFCC397.2030504@FreeBSD.org> References: <4BD9FBA3.1050707@protected-networks.net> <201004291923.19471.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4BDA2C3A.80506@protected-networks.net> <201004301405.24206.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4BFCC397.2030504@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 08:38:03 -0500 Message-ID: From: Brandon Gooch To: Beat Gaetzi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox 3.2.0-beta-1 fails to compile on -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 13:38:06 -0000 On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote: > On 05/26/10 08:27, Brandon Gooch wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >>> On Thursday 29 April 2010 09:02 pm, Michael Butler wrote: >>>> On 04/29/10 19:23, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >>>>> I read the source again and I found it is not "patched" by the >>>>> emulator itself. =A0It's done from usual _CRS method. =A0Please try >>>>> the attached patch instead. >>>> >>>> Now I get .. >>>> >>>> kBuild: iasl DevicesR3 - >>>> /usr/home/imb/svn/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.0_OSE/src/VBox >>>> /Devices/PC/vbox-cpuhotplug.dsl >>>> /usr/home/imb/svn/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.0_OSE/out/free >>>> bsd.x86/release/obj/DevicesR3/vboxssdt-cpuhotplug.hex.pre 14: >>>> =A0Device (SCK0) { Name (_HID, "ACPI0004") Name (_UID, "SCKCPU0") >>>> Processor (CPU0, 0x00, 0x0, 0x0 ) { Name (_HID, "ACPI0007") Name >>>> (_UID, "SCK0-CPU0") Name (_PXM, 0x00) Method(_MAT, 0) { IF >>>> (CPCK(0x00)) { Name (APIC, Buffer (8) {0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, >>>> 0x01}) Return(APIC) } Else { Return (0x00) } } Method(_STA) { IF >>>> (CPCK(0x00)) { Return (0xF) } Else { Return (0x0) } } Method(_EJ0, >>>> 1) { Store(0x00, \_SB.CPUL) Return } } } >>>> >>>> Error =A0 =A04080 - >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Invali= d object type for reserved >>>> name ^ (found INTEGER, requires Buffer) >>>> >>>> =A0.. where the "Return(0x00)" as the alternate result to >>>> "Result(APIC)" is causing an issue, >>> >>> Sigh... =A0A new file, a new bug. :-( >>> >>> Try the attached patch. >> >> It seems this patch has been committed to the 'virtualbox-ose-devel' >> port, but your previous patch (attached to an earlier message in this >> thread) did not. Will you submit the original patch to the >> freebsd-vbox crew as well? > > I forgot to commit this patch to the virtualbox-ose-devel port as our > main focus is on the 3.2.0 port at the moment with already includes this > patch. I will commit the patch in a few minutes to the -devel port. > I see... Well, as it stands, both of my laptops, one running CURRENT, the other running 8.1-PRERELEASE, panic when loading the vboxdrv module right now (on 3.2.1 at least), so I'm looking to rollback to 3.1.8 -- or test 3.2.0 :) Will you announce to the list when we VirtualBox users should begin testing 3.2.0? Or did I already miss that? > > Thanks for the reminder! > Beat > Thank you! -Brandon