From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 12:53:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868C216A4CE; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:53:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000C343FE1; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:53:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([192.168.0.5]) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id hB7KrTaJ008923; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 15:53:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 15:53:28 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: "Simon L. Nielsen" Message-Id: <20031207155328.55811701.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20031207194731.GB692@arthur.nitro.dk> References: <3FD2F0C7.3040900@lonesome.com> <20031207194731.GB692@arthur.nitro.dk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Mark Linimon cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-www@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: rework of the main web site's "internal" page X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 20:53:32 -0000 On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 20:47:31 +0100 "Simon L. Nielsen" wrote: OK... So I ended up NOT going out of town after the party last night. So I can comment on this now that I'm awake. :) > On 2003.12.07 03:20:07 -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > > Currently, internal.html is in an apparently random order, and also > > stylistically doesn't quite resemble the other pages. This patch: > > > [...] > > > > I'm certainly looking for feedback on this. > > I like it. It seems that something odd happened to your patch (HTML -> > text conversion by mailman?), but the resulting page looks like a big > improvement to me. I agree with Simon on this, it looks really nice. Only comment I have would be to use diff -ru so it's easier to read. Though that's more my own style. :) -- Tom Rhodes