From owner-freebsd-mobile Thu Jan 11 0:15:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (mta07-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF0637B404 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:15:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from dmlb.org ([62.253.135.85]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP id <20010111081509.UZOP26323.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@dmlb.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:15:09 +0000 Received: from dmlb by dmlb.org with local (Exim 3.03 #1) id 14GctF-000HRt-00; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:15:21 +0000 Content-Length: 741 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200101110258.f0B2wTs66679@harmony.village.org> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:15:21 -0000 (GMT) From: Duncan Barclay To: Warner Losh Subject: Re: pccardd, pccard and memory mapping Cc: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 11-Jan-01 Warner Losh wrote: >: However, I would like to solicit opinions on whether doing this would be >: worthwhile given NEWCARD? Is NEWCARD ever going to reach -stable? If not, >: I think that tidying up this area would be useful. > > NEWCARD may reach -stable, but never as default. I think it would be > worth tidying up, and if you have the time, go for it. How quickly is OLDCARD going to die in -current? Is it worth fixing it in -current first and then MFC? > Warner Duncan --- ________________________________________________________________________ Duncan Barclay | God smiles upon the little children, dmlb@dmlb.org | the alcoholics, and the permanently stoned. dmlb@freebsd.org| Steven King To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message