From owner-freebsd-scsi Fri Feb 12 16:50:24 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA03894 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 16:50:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA03885 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 16:50:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.2/8.9.1) id BAA72932; Sat, 13 Feb 1999 01:50:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: spork Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CAM and -stable References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 13 Feb 1999 01:50:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: spork's message of "Fri, 12 Feb 1999 14:43:10 -0500 (EST)" Message-ID: Lines: 18 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org spork writes: > On 16 Dec 1998, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > It's not lack of tags that's the problem (64 is pretty good), but the > > fact that the firmware (incorrectly) reports that it's out of queue > > slots when things get busy. > The vendor claims otherwise ;) I'm not surprised that the vendor is reluctant to admit that their firmware is buggy. > Can I ask where you came upon that information? It's a quite common bug in SCSI firmware, and I have a disk (Quantum Atlas II) which exhibits the same symptoms. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message