From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 08:16:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A8F16A4CE; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:16:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B065843D1D; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:16:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i1CGGvfo015858; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:16:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:16:57 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com To: David Xu In-Reply-To: <402B03B7.1000104@freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should ps -p list threads? X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:16:59 -0000 On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, David Xu wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > > >On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > >> > >>Should there be a way for ps to be able to display > >>threads for a specific pid? > >> > >> > > > >Yes, I think so, but ps with no options should not list threads > >by default. It should take an option to _enable_ listing > >threads (KSE's really). > > > > > I think it is already there, type: > ps -H But 'ps' without -H seems to display KSEs where it shouldn't. -- Dan Eischen